Monday, June 15, 2015

Ohio, a Pearson State


Not a good month for Pearson
 
The Pearson Corporation is a multi-billion dollar United Kingdom enterprise which has grown from a construction company to include newspapers, entertainment enterprises such as amusement parks, and book publishers among its holdings. In 2000 Pearson spent $2.5 billion to acquire an American testing company in an effort to increase its profits through securing contracts to produce standardized tests and test preparation materials

 

(http://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/pearson-education-115026.html). It has been given enormous control over K-12 public schools in Ohio by the Ohio legislature and governor.

 

Pearson effectively controls what is taught, who graduates, and even who gets a second chance at a high school diploma through the General Education Diploma (GED) examination. Recently Comcast was prevented from acquiring Time Warner because the federal government determined that Comcast's control of 60% of the market was too great. But that market share pales compared to the 100% Pearson has been granted by the State of Ohio.

 

Since 2013, Pearson tests even license teachers in Ohio. Because the tests are designed and graded by Pearson, the company and its employees determine what teachers need to know in all particular teaching fields-English, science, history. Colleges must address what Pearson puts on the tests so that their students will be licensed to teach in Ohio initially and, later, when a teacher seeks professional advancement.

 

By 2018, Pearson end of course exams in designated subjects in grades 9 -12--PARCC Tests--will determine if a student receives an Ohio high school diploma. PARCC tests-Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and careers-are to be based on Common Core State Standards (CCSS), developed with primary input from Pearson.

 

In January of 2014 Pearson produced a revised GED exam---a new version of the GED that is to be taken entirely on-line. The pass rate fell 90 percent because the test now measures college readiness rather than what was actually learned in high school.

 

Pearson controls the curriculum by defining the knowledge and skills a student must master. Pearson assures us the CCSS will be rigorous; i.e. that at least thirty percent or more of students taking the tests will fail. An educator such as Dr. Louisa Moats, who was a contributing writer of CCSS, is just one of many of those critical of the jump to test and fail (https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/child-development-central/201401/when-will-we-ever-learn). These standards for which Pearson oversaw the development, helped by tax free money such as an $88 million dollar grant from the Gates Foundation, in turn require the development and selling of both on-line materials and textbooks to prepare the teacher to teach to the test. Pearson produces the materials from which the teachers teach and the tests that tell us if they have performed satisfactorily. In Ohio they have no competitors. If your school "fails" then send your child to a Connections Academy, a Pearson for-profit Charter advertised on their GED webpage.

 

Teachers, parents, and concerned citizens have criticized the tests on a number of grounds-the number of tests, the time the tests take, the appropriateness of the questions, the secrecy about the test questions, the spying on students' social media, the use of the tests for punishment, teaching to the test, the ignoring of the arts, the expense and failure of the technology for administering the tests, and the tremendous cost to taxpayers. The mania for testing and collecting volumes of data are destroying our education system and creating a world of big profits for the Pearson corporation and Big Brother-ism--all approved by our Ohio Legislature and Governor and supported by Federal legislation-No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top.

 

 

 


William Phillis

John Oliver on testing and Pearson


<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/J6lyURyVz7k?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

The worm is turning

On Sunday, the Beacon Journal’s astute education writer , Doug Livingston, took up the travesty once again under the headline “Charter schools misspend millions in Ohio”.
Braced with figures from State Auditor Dave Yost’s team, Livingston topped his report with a telling opening paragraph:
“No sector – not local governments, school districts, court systems, public universities or hospitals – misspends tax dollars like charter schools in Ohio'”
Based on the writer’s review of 4,263 audits by the state auditor, the money was misspent “four times more often than any other type of taxpayer agency.” Say, $27.3 million. There are some other for-profit charter organizations in Ohio, but none with the commanding scope of White Hat’s influence
Although Yost is committed to cleaning up the gore, he’s fighting a losing battle. The size and reach of the charter system has grown so large that he doesn’t have a staff that’s big enough to cover all of it.

Friday, May 8, 2015

Charter-school reforms should continue

Charter-school reforms should continue



The blended schools and drop out recovery schools are also prime candidates for fraud. Nexus Academies, Life Skills etc

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

More virtual school potential fraud

Ohio lawmakers forward e-school attendance allegations

ASSOCIATED PRESS
COLUMBUS — State lawmakers in Ohio have referred allegations to authorities that an online charter school failed to dis-enroll hundreds of chronically truant students in order to pad its rolls.
Ohio Virtual Academy, which serves about 13,000 students statewide, says it follows all state reporting laws and enrollment guidelines.
Reps. Bill Hayes (R., Harrison Township) and Teresa Fedor (D., Toledo), the House Education Committee’s top Republican and Democrat, told the Associated Press on Monday they have forwarded an anonymous whistleblower’s email to state Auditor Dave Yost, whose office has made school attendance fraud a priority.
Hayes also involved the Ohio Department of Education and alerted the school, whose authorizer said it is conducting its own review.
The whistleblower provided a lengthy list of specific students listed as truant, in some cases for most of the school year.

I wonder how much this cost the Ohio taxpayers?  How many youths are going to be unprepared to be productive citizens because of a lack of education because the E-school is more concerned about collecting money than insuring the students receive an adequate education.  A shameful scam.

I think K-12 is in trouble and would not be buying their stock.

Monday, May 4, 2015

CURMUDGUCATION: Do Charters Create Pressure for Excellence

CURMUDGUCATION: Do Charters Create Pressure for Excellemce: Charles Sahm and I have been in as low motion conversation about charters. After the New York Times ran a less-than-inspiring portrayal of E...



Another good analysis of the costs of E-Schools in PA