Showing posts with label K-12. Show all posts
Showing posts with label K-12. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Another E-School Investigation

A great expose on K-12 in California.  From The Mercury News:
http://www.mercurynews.com/education/ci_29780959/k12-inc-california-virtual-academies-operator-exploits-charter


This the playbook for the Ohio E-Schools




Some key findings:
  • Teachers employed by K12 Inc.'s charter schools may be asked to inflate attendance and enrollment records used to determine taxpayer funding.

  • Ohio E-School Charters are fighting this accountability issue right now.

  • Fewer than half of the students who start the online high schools earn diplomas, and almost none of them are qualified to attend the state's public universities.


  • Check out the report cards for the Ohio E-Schools.  Dismal at best.


  • K12's heavily marketed online model has helped the company reap more than $310 million in state funding over the past 12 years.


  • Market! market! market! Where do they get the money for the radio and TV ads?  SOme interesting accounting.  Make sure the school never makes a profit and write off the loss.


  • Students who spend as little as one minute during a school day logged in to K12's school software may be counted as present in records used to calculate the amount of funding the schools get from the state.
  • About half of the schools' students are not proficient in reading, and only a third are proficient in math -- levels that fall far below statewide averages.
  • School districts that are supposed to oversee the company's schools have a strong financial incentive to turn a blind eye to problems: They get a cut of the academies' revenue, which largely comes from state coffers.


  • Also note the governance issue.  K-12 sets up and loads the boards.  Same as they do in Ohio


    I like pictures







    Monday, November 2, 2015

    Schools as a business

    Another excellent article from Denis Smith.  He hits the inherent conflict of interest between operating a business and doing what is right for the students.


    http://www.plunderbund.com/2015/10/27/are-public-charter-schools-also-considered-businesses-mind-the-quotation-marks/


    These charter schools are operated as personal fiefdoms.  This is another great example


    "If people consider a school to be a business enterprise, inevitably the profit motive gets confused with the educational mission, which is what schools are supposed to be all about. The proliferation of for-profit national charter school chains has been a chief contributor toward the blurring of pedagogy and profit. And entities like Imagine and K12, a publicly traded company that is a big player in the virtual school field, only add to the growing perception that charter schools are first and foremost businesses and thus are all about money and privatization."


    "Likewise, the nation is indebted to the Washington Supreme Court for its ability to teach us a civics lesson and, in the process, highlight a problem of democracy. When a board that is hand-picked by a private corporation and spends public funds to run what is called a “public” charter school that is a problem of democracy due to the absence of voter input – a violation of the democratic process.
    We also should extend our thanks to the League of Women Voters for helping the Washington Supreme Court to understand that a school is not a business, but it nevertheless must be our business to ensure that schools are learning communities, not profit-centered enterprises, governed by citizens chosen in elections by qualified voters, not by corporations."

    Monday, July 20, 2015

    David Hansen Resigns

    From the Washington Post.  There is also a lot of coverage from the Cleveland and Columbus press.  I do not see much from the Cincinnati press.

    The "mask" is off.  Money talks.  He got caught scrubbing data.

    Results matter.  Good and bad.  No excuses.

    "In the latest mark against Ohio’s troubled charter school sector, David Hansen, the Ohio Education Department official responsible for school choice and charter schools, just resigned after admitting that he gave help to charter schools to make them look better in state evaluations.

    Hansen, who resigned Saturday, recently acknowledged that he omitted from evaluations “F” grades received by online and dropout recovery schools. The evaluations were not for the schools themselves but for their sponsoring (or authorizing) organizations. His actions, according to the Associated Press, “boosted the ratings of two sponsors” so that it was possible that they could be eligible for more help from the state.

    Hansen was required to include all school scores in the evaluations, which have since been retracted by the department. According to the Plain Dealer, the “F” grades the schools received were given “for failing to teach kids enough material over the school year.”

    Hansen’s wife is Beth Hansen, chief of staff to Kasich. Kasich is expected to jump into the race for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, and Beth Hansen is planning to work for the campaign.

    The AP quoted David Hansen, the executive director of Ohio’s Office of Quality School Choice and the Office of Community Schools, as saying that he omitted the failing grades because he thought they would “mask” other successes by the schools.

    Monday, June 29, 2015

    Inexplicity bad


    An excellent article on the non-accountable online charter schools.  The online schools get a one year exemption on their  first year test scores for transfer students. 

     

    As noted elsewhere in this blog  sponsorship is a big business in Ohio.  3% of the state funds.  Do the math at $267 million per year over $8 million being siphoned to the sponsors.  One could create quite an empire for $8 million.

     

    Yet the sponsors remain unaccountable.  The state of Ohio has also removed all the scores for online schools to grade their effectiveness. 

     


     

     

     

    Tuesday, May 5, 2015

    More virtual school potential fraud

    Ohio lawmakers forward e-school attendance allegations

    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    COLUMBUS — State lawmakers in Ohio have referred allegations to authorities that an online charter school failed to dis-enroll hundreds of chronically truant students in order to pad its rolls.
    Ohio Virtual Academy, which serves about 13,000 students statewide, says it follows all state reporting laws and enrollment guidelines.
    Reps. Bill Hayes (R., Harrison Township) and Teresa Fedor (D., Toledo), the House Education Committee’s top Republican and Democrat, told the Associated Press on Monday they have forwarded an anonymous whistleblower’s email to state Auditor Dave Yost, whose office has made school attendance fraud a priority.
    Hayes also involved the Ohio Department of Education and alerted the school, whose authorizer said it is conducting its own review.
    The whistleblower provided a lengthy list of specific students listed as truant, in some cases for most of the school year.

    I wonder how much this cost the Ohio taxpayers?  How many youths are going to be unprepared to be productive citizens because of a lack of education because the E-school is more concerned about collecting money than insuring the students receive an adequate education.  A shameful scam.

    I think K-12 is in trouble and would not be buying their stock.

    Saturday, February 28, 2015

    More analysis on charters from Minnesota

    Students in most Minnesota charter schools are failing to hit learning targets and are not achieving adequate academic growth, according to a Star Tribune analysis of school performance data.

    The analysis of 128 of the state’s 157 charter schools show that the gulf between the academic success of its white and minority students widened at nearly two-thirds of those schools last year. Slightly more than half of charter schools students were proficient in reading, dramatically worse than traditional public schools, where 72 percent were proficient.
    Between 2011 and 2014, 20 charter schools failed every year to meet the state’s expectations for academic growth each year, signaling that some of Minnesota’s most vulnerable students had stagnated academically.
    A top official with the Minnesota Department of Education says she is troubled by the data, which runs counter to “the public narrative” that charter schools are generally superior to public schools.
    More than half of schools analyzed from 2011 to 2014 were also failing to meet the department’s expectations for academic growth, the gains made from year to year in reading and math.
    Of the 20 schools that failed to meet the state goals for improvement every year, Pillsbury United Communities is the authorizer for six of those schools: Dugsi Academy, LoveWorks Academy for Visual and Performing Arts, Connections Academy, Learning for Leadership Charter School, and the Minnesota Transitions Charter School’s elementary, Connections Academy and Virtual High School. Those schools also missed annual achievement gap targets.

    Wednesday, December 17, 2014

    Some things I learned while living with a charter school administrator, Part 1


    My grandfather had a favorite saying.  You are either part of the problem or part of the solution.

    My Ex-wife was an administrator for an E-school.  The marriage ended on bad terms. 

    Some things I learned while living with a charter school administrator.

    That charter schools are called community schools in Ohio.  Many are not located in the community and actually suck significant amount of money from a local community or district with no charter schools.  Community schools has a folksy sounding name, better for marketing.

    That ethics are optional.

    That there are many ways to game the system to benefit your own interests. 

    There is little oversight.

    Self-preservation is a powerful force.  Being an administrator is a pretty good gig.

    There is an inherent conflict between producing results and producing revenue by increasing  the headcount.  This conflict causes some stress at first but you get over it.  More students mean more dollars.

    That E-schools are not for everyone, and probably not for the majority of the students enrolled.

    That E-schools are a profitable business.  The schools themselves are “non-profit”.  How it works is that you send most of the money to the management company who set up the school.  That school money gets siphoned to the management company, usually to a local entrepreneur who established the management company or to a large or giant corporation like K-12 Inc. and Pearson Education.  They need to take enough so that the school never will show a profit.  Non-profit status does not apply to the management company.

    That you can pay students and parent to take tests by offering them gift cards.  That the schools really would prefer that some students not take the tests.

    That despite millions of dollars coming in the door, that you can have a part-time treasurer.  That treasurer can serve many charter schools.  The treasurer does not audit the management company.

    If your treasurer gets indicted for malfeasance at another school, you should hire a new one.

    The majority of the Ohio E-schools have the same sponsor.

    The sponsor takes their fee based on total revenue.  It is very profitable to be a sponsor.   I don’t see much in the way of staff or overhead for these sponsors.

    That the management company can make millions for it’s founders.

    That the salary information listed on web sites is out of date and inaccurate, too low for administrators.

    That you can invest the money earned from one state to expand in another and internationally.  More students mean more dollars.

    Wednesday, November 19, 2014

    The worm is turning

    The charter school industry has had a big advantage in marketing  and presenting a positive reform minded message to the consumers and voters of Ohio.

    Although the schools themselves may be non-profits, the  for profit parent companies are very profitable.  The K-12s and White Hats, Pearsons,  can lobby politicians, buy TV and radio ads, and push the freedom of choice message.  The message is loud, attractive and professional.  Combined, they can spend millions and massage their message.

    What the message fails to convey are  the actual results of the schools and the cost of this transfer from public to private.

    My sense is that the worm is turning.  I now see letters to the editors concerning the transfer of dollars to charters from concerned parents and taxpayers.  I see grass root organizations of parents pushing back.  I see websites like knowyourcharter.com providing information.  I see Facebook pages like cashing in on kids.  I see blogs covering education issues.  I see the press asking why politicians are taking trips to Turkey.  I see investigations and indictments.  I see questions on where the money is going and what we are getting for that money.  I see proposals for reform and accountability. 

    I did not see this push back for several years.   I saw only positive spin on the charter school saviors coming to help.  They left out some important details, like results.  The devil is in the details.

    Friday, November 14, 2014

    Bloomberg takes on K-12

    Not a good investment.  Good article

    Plagued by subpar test scores, the largest operator of online public schools in the U.S. has lost management contracts or been threatened with school shutdowns in five states this year. The National Collegiate Athletic Association ruled in April that students can no longer count credits from 24 K12 high schools toward athletic scholarships

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-14/k12-backed-by-milken-suffers-low-scores-as-states-resist.html#disqus_thread

    The results for Ohio:
    The 2012-2013 Ohio Department of Education report card shows 1 C, 1 D and 6 F's With a performance index of 73.0% and Indicators met of 45.8%[2

    The 2013-2014 Ohio Department of Education report card shows 1 C, 1 D and 6 F's With a performance index of 73.6% and Indicators met of 41.7% [3]

    http://reportcard.education.ohio.gov/Archives%20TS/Community%20Schools/142950/142950_2012-2013_BUILD.pdf

    http://reportcard.education.ohio.gov/Pages/School-Report.aspx?SchoolIRN=142950

    Monday, November 10, 2014

    Ohio is number 4, and that is not good

    Follow the money!

    I sense that the pendulum is swinging back towards sanity after a failed billion dollar experiment.  More articles in the papers.  More letters to the editor.  More pressure on the politicians. 

    http://www.ohio.com/news/local/ohio-s-for-profit-charter-schools-drag-state-into-group-of-nation-s-worst-performers-1.539387?localLinksEnabled=false

    "Ohio’s charter schools have a national reputation for hiring for-profit companies that produce poor academic results.

    Only three of 26 states had lower performing charter schools, according to a Stanford University study of states with schools in operation long enough to compare results.

    A factor in the difference appears to be the motivation to make money.

    Tennessee, New York and Rhode Island, which the study reckons have the highest-performing charter school sectors, are among the six states that ban for-profit companies.

    At the other end of the spectrum, Ohio trails only Michigan and Texas in the percentage of taxpayer-funded charter schools run by for-profit companies, according to the Colorado-based National Education Policy Center.

    • Of the 16 lowest performing networks, 14 were managed by for-profit companies.

    • The online charter schools Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow and Ohio Virtual Academy, which account for a quarter of all charter enrollment, averaged the lowest student growth in the state.

    • Of the 12 highest-performing charter school networks, eight hired nonprofit management organizations.

    • $503 million of $920 million in public funding went to charter schools managed by for-profit companies. A little over half of the $920 million went to out-of-state companies.

    • Out-of-state and for-profit companies enrolled 74,458 of the 119,271 Ohio charter school students."

    Wednesday, October 29, 2014

    A .375 GPA

    Some insights from a recent auditor’s report.  I think  I am reading this correctly. 
    Imagine Schools Inc. has been justifiably  criticized for paying a subsidiary more money in rent than it does for its teaching staff and producing poor results.  The national benchmark for rent is 15% according to an article in the Columbus Dispatch. 
    A recent audit of Ohio Connections Academy shows that teaching and administration total $5,268,575.  Overhead totals $6,003,793.   113% more than the money for teaching salary and benefits.  Overhead is undefined.  This money flows out of the state to a Maryland management company, Connections Learning,  who does with it as they wish.  There is little in bricks and mortar expense.  Compare that to 15% rent benchmark.
    The management company can recycle the same software year after year.  They can sell essentially the same software to multiple states.  The transfer and accounting of the overhead expense insures that the non-profit altruistic E-school never will show a profit.  Useful to show why they cannot pay teachers more or to elicit sympathy from parents or politicians.  They are the underdog. 
    Yet it is a very profitable business for the management company. Connections Learning, K-12 and others are aggressively expanding in every state possible.  Underdog status also justifies the need for more money and more students.  See page 20 on the attached link. 
    What are the latest state report card results for this E-school?  1 C, 2 D’s and 5 F’s.  A .375 GPA.  It would be nice if they could move the decimal point.
    To help manage the multimillion dollar budget they hired a part-time treasurer  who is under indictment for her role as treasurer with Cincinnati College Preparatory Academy.  I guess there is no need for an on-site full time treasurer. 
    The audit also shows unresolved title money issues totaling $668,642 (see page 46).  When will this be resolved?  To paraphrase a politician, pretty soon we are talking real money.  At best it shows that they are sloppy with their record keeping.  At worst is suggests that they are playing with the allocations to put more of scarce title money in their pockets at the expense of taxpayers. 
    There is an obvious problem.  Look at the proliferation of E-schools in Ohio.  Who benefits?
    What is needed?  Transparency, strong boards (which are not lead around by the nose by the management company), and oversight.  These characteristics exist in the vast majority of our public school districts.  Oh by the way, results  would be good too.

    Wednesday, September 24, 2014

    95% Fees, how to cash in on kids

    http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2014/09/the_95_fees_that_charter_schools_pay_white_hat_go_before_the_ohio_supreme_court_today.html

    Interesting article on how to convert public funds to private property and profit.  It also makes it very difficult for a school board to act independently from the entity that created it. 

    This case is currently in the Ohio Supreme Court.

    OHDELA paid 75 percent of its $14 million budget to White Hat as a management fee.

    Outside of White Hat, audits for online charter school Ohio Virtual Academy showed a similar pattern. About two-thirds of the $68 million the school spent in 2010-11-- $43 million -- went toward purchasing services from K12 Inc., the company that runs it.

    The profit margins are a closely guarded secret.  My understanding, is that the profit margin for Ohio Connections Academy (owned by Pearson) is 30%.  Yet that school hired a part time treasurer.  No need for detailed disclosure.  No need for an elected board.

    The money make millionaires out of some.  The money provides many separate districts which then create  high paying principals, superintendants, treasurers and managers. The sponsors take their piece of the action.  Unfortunately the students and teachers are not beneficiaries of this system. 

    Better education results are a worthy goal.  Unfortunately, this is a failed billion dollar experiment.  The results speak for themselves.  Check the report cards.  A few individuals profit greatly, obtain fancy titles, money and perks and promise that someday they will produce results.  What a scam.

    Friday, May 23, 2014

    David vs. Goliath, your tax dollars at work

    A grassroots movement is afoot to try to educate the public.  You might think that traditional schools would have an advantage.  This is not the case.  Please see the excellent appeal from Mr. Nottke below.  The competition is for hearts and minds is not in favor of those without multimillion dollar advertising and marketing budgets. The competition is fierce.

    "The USA TODAY analysis finds that 10 of the largest for-profit operators have spent an estimated $94.4 million on ads since 2007. The largest, Virginia-based K12 Inc., has spent about $21.5 million in just the first eight months of 2012."

    Keep in mind this is just one of many E-schools and charter schools.  Ohio taxpayers are funding this advertising campaign.  I think most taxpayers would be extremely annoyed if they found their local school district was spending any significant money on marketing.
    No one should be afraid of improvements and innovation.  However, the school results speak for themselves.  There is an inherent conflict of interest of profits versus student achievement.

    An excellent appeal from Bruce Nottke.  I would encourage everyone to sign up for the emails.

    Fellow Educators,
    My name is Bruce Nottke and I am a board member for the Athens City Schools. I am writing to you in regards to my growing concerns about charter schools. My concerns rest not only with the loss of dollars to public schools, but more importantly with the poor quality of education our students receive from many of the charter schools currently operating in Ohio. The businesses that operate most of the charter school programs clearly have little interest in student achievement, with their primary focus being to make a profit.
    I strongly believe that while school administrators understand the dire situation, the typical Ohio taxpayer does not know about or does not fully understand how private businesses are operating charter schools for monetary gain while offering what is often a sub-par educational experience to our children. I believe we, as representatives of the children of Ohio, must make a greater effort to inform the citizens in each of our communities about the issue of charter schools, how their existence drains money from the local public schools, and the fact that charter schools are often less effective in educating our children.
    The purpose of this letter is that I would like to encourage each Superintendent and Board Member to sign up for the Coalition for Equity and Adequacy mailing list by sending a request to the following e-mail address: ohioeanda@sbcglobal.net The E&A provides frequent, well written pieces that are intended to inform school personnel and local citizens about issues related to school funding, including the specific concerns with the charter school movement. After signing up for the E&A Listserv, please forward the e-mail notices to your respective local newspapers and members of your communities so that taxpayers can see how our tax money is being wasted on continuing to fund the failed experiment of charter schools. I strongly believe that if more taxpayers know the truth about charter schools in Ohio, they may be motivated to join together to change the conversation at the Statehouse as it relates to charter school legislation.
    I am hopeful that every Superintendent and Board Member in Ohio will be willing to band together so we can make a change for the better for public education. Please accept my invitation to clearly communicate about this important issue to members of your community. Thank you in advance for considering my request.
    Sincerely,
    Bruce Nottke
    Athens City School Board

    Thursday, May 15, 2014

    NCAA Bans some credits in E-Schools

    NCAA Bans Coursework Completed by Athletes in 24 K12 Inc. Virtual Schools

    | No comments

    The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) won't accept coursework completed by student athletes at two dozen virtual schools operated by K12, Inc., as of 2014-15, at any Division I or Division II college or university.
    K12, the Herndon, Va-based online education company, was notified on April 9 of the development, after learning in 2012 that its schools were placed under NCAA "extended evaluation" review for the eligibility of their courses, according to Mary Gifford, senior vice president of education policy and external relations, during a phone interview today. She called that "a good process where the NCAA reviews courses on an individual basis," but was less sanguine about this latest development.
    Students must register for initial-eligibility certification through the NCAA. Most of the students affected by the announcement participate in individual sports like gymnastics, swimming, diving and golf, where the option to attend school online gives them more time to practice and train, she said.
    Eleven of the 24 schools impacted are from the California Virtual Academies. Two more K12 schools—San Francisco Flex Academy and Silicon Valley Flex Academy—are blended high schools where students attend the learning center daily and receive face-to-face instruction from certified teachers, according to company spokesman Jeff Kwitowski.
    Beyond California, all of the schools are online-only. Three are in Washington state, two in Colorado, and one each in Ohio, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Nevada, and Georgia. A full list of schools is available on the Athletic Scholarships website, which reported that the virtual schools in question are considered "nontraditional high schools" offering courses that don't meet the NCAA's requirements for nontraditional courses.
    The NCAA, a private organization, did not respond today to our inquiry seeking an explanation of where K12 fell short in meeting their expectations. K12, a publicly traded company, manages schools and offers blended learning programs in more than 30 states, and enrolls 125,000 students. This ruling by the NCAA would impact less than 1 percent of them, Griffin said.
    On its blog, K12 indicated that the NCAA has revised legislation for nontraditional courses, students and instructors. The requirement is that teachers and students must have "ongoing access to one another" and "regular interaction" throughout the duration of the course.
    "However [the] NCAA does not provide schools any measurable standard or rubric used to determine what they believe is a suitable level of student-teacher interaction. Despite repeated requests, the NCAA will not publish specific student-teacher interaction guidelines for nontraditional courses, including online and digital courses," wrote Kwitowski in his blog post.
    It was in 2009, when students were "moving from sophomores to juniors" in the organization's evolving high school program, that K12 began working with the NCAA to get its courses approved, Gifford said. "In 2012, we shifted from blanket approval to the extended evaluation process, which we didn't have any objection to," as long as there's a rubric to follow to establish and maintain eligibility, she indicated. That rubric has not been forthcoming, nor have the measurements that would explain adequate teacher-student interaction, she said.
    One college student, a Division I diver in Arizona who received some of her credits from a K12 school, had the eligibility of her coursework denied, then reinstated when her college appealed, the K12 officials said. The company's own appeal fell on deaf NCAA ears.
    "In Arizona, teacher testimony was submitted as part of an appeal. But that was not an acceptable demonstration," Gifford said, noting that written documentation from a credentialed professional was ruled unacceptable.
    For students concerned about their eligibility in this school year, the NCAA's Eligibility Center indicated that coursework completed from spring 2013 through spring 2014 will be "subject to further review on a case-by-case basis."
    The company has been in the headlines with other bad news this school year, including an under-enrollment of 11,000 students, which hit its stock price last fall. My colleague, Sean Cavanagh, recently reported on an investor lawsuit targeting K12, and the stock sales of its former CEO Ron Packard, as well as the fact that the company launched Fuel Education as a new brand without keeping "K12" in its name.

    Follow @EdWeekMMolnar and @EdWeekIandI for the latest news on industry and innovation in education.

    Friday, May 9, 2014

    E-Schools, Charter Schools and Governance


    The E-schools themselves are set up as nonprofits.  The nonprofits are run by an unelected board.  The K-12’s and Connection Academy’s of the world set up the board. The board agrees to contracts with K-12,  OHDELA or Connections Academy without competitive bidding.

    The structure encourages malfeasance and the siphoning of profits to the parent companies.  For all intents and purposes the E-Schools run the boards.  The boards depend on the E-schools for the information to manage the school.  The board members are not paid.

    An excellent article by Denis Smith here :


    “All control and direction for the school comes on high from corporate, and such constructs as school governing boards and local governance amount to distractions. Clearly, local control is an oxymoron to the Dennis Bakkes of the charter school industry.

    The memo also makes it clear that no autonomy is expected of the boards which are chosen mostly by the company’s regional managers. While the best of our nation’s schools usually feature a collaborative model where teams of teachers work with school administrators, privatization of public schools that are operated by national chains seems to come only with a top-down approach, and any semblance of a governing board to provide guidance and oversight for the school’s operations is not to be tolerated in Bakke’s world.

    In Ohio, the Revised Code treats a charter school as a school district, with its own treasurer, chief administrative officer, and governing board. But state law also allows great latitude regarding the operation and governance of the school, and current law requires that each school have a minimum of five board members, with no other qualifications stated in the law.”

    Denis Smith was a consultant with the Ohio Department of Education and reviewed Ohio Charter schools.  His commentary is available through Diane Ravitch's Blog.  http://dianeravitch.net/2014/03/25/denis-smith-of-ohio-who-governs-charter-schools/


    Raymond Lambert of Connections Academy once had this to say about boards.  I understand that he has set up many boards in Ohio, Michigan and Indiana.

    “I wonder why people sit on Boards? Is it a cheap self esteem boost?”

     
     “ I often think the many Boards I have seen are lead around by the nose anyway.”

     

    I know that the superintendent of Ohio Connections Academy, Marie C. Hanna, recruited her close friend and former neighbor, Pamela S. Bowers, to sit on her board.  Independent?  Objective?

     
    Combine a couple of hand-picked board members and combine that with a couple of well-meaning but unqualified parent board members and you have a serious but profitable governance situation.  Again, where is the independence?

    Keep in mind that a billion dollars has been transferred out of the public schools to charter schools in Ohio.